Posted by: znewkirk | June 19, 2009

Review: The Taking of Pelham 123

2009 | Director: Tony Scott (“True Romance,” “Crimson Tide”) | Writer: Brian Helgeland (“Nightmare on Elm Street 4,” “Conspiracy Theory”)

Among the things that made the original “The Taking of Pelham 123” such a distinct heist film was the unmistakable presence of Walter Matthau, whose droopy appearance and schlubby persona made him the perfect lead for such an oddly-proportioned movie; clothed in one of the more hideous suits 1974 money can buy, Matthau’s Lt. Zachary Garber is first seen sleeping on the job before his character is introduced via a series of uncouth insults to a group of visiting Japanese businessmen, setting him up as an unlikely opponent for a criminal mastermind. By contrast, Tony Scott’s 2009 remake version of the character, Walter Garber (Denzel Washington), is far too capable, intelligent, and, despite the weight gain, attractive to come across as any sort of underdog; without that intriguing cat-and-mouse hook, the new “Pelham” is forced to rely on its screenplay to carry it home, and it’s just not up to the task.

"Hey, stop, or I'll shoot! Come back here! Ehhh...never mind."

"Hey, stop, or I'll shoot! Come back here! Ahhh...just forget it."

The plot stays nearly the same: a subway train leaving Pelham Station at 1:23 PM in New York City is stopped and held, along with its passengers, for ransom by a team of determined criminals led by Ryder (John Travolta), a foul-mouthed thug with a psychopathic twinkle in his eye. Ryder informs Garber, who happens to be working dispatch for the subway that day, that if 10,000,000 bucks, cash money, aren’t delivered to them in an hour, hostages will be executed. Mucking up the works are a nervous accomplice (Luis Guzman), an ineffective hostage negotiator (John Turturro), and the politically impotent Mayor of NYC (James Gandolfini).

Travolta searches his pockets for dignity

Travolta searches his pockets for dignity

Most people remember Robert Shaw in the antagonist role in the original, and rightly so: his glassy-eyed calm at the specter of death gave that movie its frightening backbone—his was truly a man who cared little for human life, following only some hidden motivation that made his character a creepy wild card, and the perfect foil for Matthau’s cynical transit cop. Luckily, Travolta does only one thing well as an actor, and that’s play crazy, meaning his Ryder isn’t much of a drop-off as far as bad guys go. Washington’s character, on the other hand, is much more fleshed-out, but it just doesn’t feel necessary in his role, and especially since, just as in the original, Scott’s “Pelham” flounders in the third act.

Washington typically arrives for a day's shoot via the sewers

Washington typically arrives for a day's shoot via the sewers

The main malefactor here isn’t Scott, surprisingly, despite his typically seizure-inducing visuals and bombastic musical cues; no, the real culprits are screenwriters Brian Helgeland and an uncredited David Koepp, who stick far too closely to the staid conclusion of the 1974 film instead of using their creative license to switch things up and twist the plot to a more unique outcome. The new “Pelham” isn’t a bad movie by any means, but it isn’t memorable, either, stalling somewhere on the scale between boring and mediocre. Perhaps it might not seem so to those who haven’t experienced the story in any of its previous incarnations, but to fans of Matthau’s grumbling flatfoot and Robert Shaw’s mastermind, the worst filmic sin committed by Scott’s re-imagining is that of laziness.

Rating: Two of Five Stars

Advertisements

Responses

  1. I believe you nailed it Zack. I remember the movie only because of Walter Matthau. I didn’t remember that Robert Shaw or anybody else was in it; but Matthau was the superb schlub who’s just biding his time towards retirement and doesn’t give a flying fling about anything. But he gets drawn in and saves the day. Maybe one of his best performances. I mean, how many movies do I remember from the 70’s? But because of Matthau I remember The Taking of Pelham 123 – though I didn’t remember how the movie ended.

  2. This is a spot on review of the film. Matthau was also in Bad News Bears in the 70’s he has had some good ones. Weirdly I remember the mayor in the original too.

  3. If the trademark Scott gloss serves as a superficial hook, his also-adept manner of building tension and suspense then keeps one interested. Good review, check out mine when you can!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: